| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lab Ratta
   |
Posted - 2007.05.19 08:51:00 -
[1]
yes why should anyone fly anything other than a gunshp with an active tank.
Just nerf everything until that is all that is viable and then everyone will start the game knowing exacly what they have to fly to be successful and not have to do anything like think for themselves or try a new thing because all balancing is for gun-ships with active tanks and everyhing else is too be nerfed.
|
Lab Ratta
|
Posted - 2007.05.19 09:50:00 -
[2]
I agree if you fly a Drake you know that it will take you longer to do missions cause the other ships can deal out much more damage faster than a Drake with a passive tank. That is what is already balancing this ship
the fact that you give up all mid slots and low slots and rig slots for your tank.
No EW, no damage mods, no RoF mods
|
Lab Ratta
|
Posted - 2007.05.19 11:20:00 -
[3]
would really like to see a change that did make the Drake a better passive than the Myrm just for the simple fact that no race should be better at shields than Caldari.
|
Lab Ratta
|
Posted - 2007.05.20 21:13:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Pottsey
ôYou know CCP didn't mean it to be a shield-tanker. Why are you surprised when they try to make you actually use its armor tanking bonus?ö
It was made as an passive shield tanker. All passive shield tanking bonus where stripped from none faction ships a while ago. Just because it has an amour bonus doesnÆt meant thatÆs all it was meant to do. Its not like you can get a none faction ship with passive tanking bonus anymore so if you only use the ships with passive bonus you cannot tank like that.
As for the nerf I donÆt see the problem both ships still have a stronger passive tank then they had 6 months ago even with the nerf. When a ship can get upwards and over 600hp/s regen on a BC it needs a nerf.
Potsy if this is done then a fully fitted 3billion+ isk should be used when balancing that ship vs the others. I mean it is active tanking 3kdps so it definalty means all ravens should be nerfed using your criteria.
|
Lab Ratta
|
Posted - 2007.05.20 21:15:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Agnar Koladrov
I think the Drake shouldn`t had been given (grammer?) the resistance bonus in the first place when it was designed. It should have gotten a missle rof bonus or something like that, making it an true misslle assault bc.
Ah well....
Cant remember for sure but i think it did have a RoF bonus in the very beginnning but then the whinners got it nerf then and they continued to whine so now it is going to get the axe again.
All this does is put everything back to where 2 or 3 ships is all that this game should have since all the rest are nerfed to uselessness.
|
Lab Ratta
|
Posted - 2007.05.21 01:27:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Scordite
Originally by: Meeat
So many ships in this game have no purpose due to the fact that there are other ships that fill the role better.
Please do not push the Drake and Myrm into this area.
I'm surprised no one's commented on this yet. Myrm will have a purpose even if they removed it's shields entirely.
Yeah thats what is sad this ship is not even using the bonuses and out shield tanks the Drake
|
| |
|